Exploring Third Party Litigation Funding: Empowering Legal Pursuits with Litigation Finance

In the realm of legal battles, the cost of pursuing justice can be a substantial barrier for individuals and businesses alike. However, a revolutionary solution has emerged in recent years that's changing the landscape of litigation – Third Party Litigation Funding. Commonly referred to as litigation finance or legalpay, this innovative concept is transforming how cases are funded and providing access to justice that was once considered out of reach.

Third party litigation funding

Understanding Third Party Litigation Funding

Third party litigation funding is a practice where a financially independent third party, often a specialized firm, provides funding to cover the costs associated with a legal dispute in exchange for a share of the potential settlement or award. This arrangement not only levels the playing field for individuals who may not have the financial resources to pursue a case but also allows businesses to mitigate the financial risks associated with litigation.

The Mechanics of Litigation Finance

In essence, litigation finance operates as a non-recourse investment. If the case is unsuccessful, the funding provider typically absorbs the loss, sparing the litigant from bearing the financial burden. If the case is successful, the funding provider receives an agreed-upon portion of the recovered amount. This arrangement aligns the interests of all parties involved and encourages funding providers to meticulously assess the viability of the cases they choose to invest in.

Key Advantages of Third-Party Litigation Funding

1. Access to Justice: One of the most profound benefits is the increased access to justice. Individuals and smaller entities can now assert their rights against well-funded opponents without being deterred by financial constraints.

2. Mitigated Risk: Businesses can offload the financial risks associated with litigation, protecting their assets and bottom line.

3. Expert Assessment: Litigation finance firms employ legal experts to assess the merit of cases. This stringent evaluation process ensures that only strong cases receive funding.

4. Strategic Leverage: Litigants can leverage third party litigation funding to negotiate settlements from a position of strength, knowing that they have the necessary resources to go the distance.

Navigating the Legal Landscape with Confidence

In recent years, litigation finance has gained significant traction across various jurisdictions. The involvement of specialized firms has brought professionalism and transparency to the process. One notable example is LegalPay, a leading provider of third-party litigation funding. They work closely with clients, attorneys, and businesses to provide tailored funding solutions that empower legal pursuits.

Conclusion

Third party litigation funding is ushering in a new era of access to justice and strategic litigation. With the support of litigation finance providers like LegalPay, litigants can pursue their legal rights without fearing the financial implications. As this field continues to evolve, more individuals and businesses will have the means to seek recourse through the legal system, ultimately fostering a fairer and more just society.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Investments in a new way - Alternative Investment Funds (AIF)

Image
An Alternative Investment Fund or AIF is an investment vehicle that privately pools investments from sophisticated investors, whether Indian or foreign, for investing according to a defined investment policy for the benefit of its investors. These funds are typically used by high-net-worth individuals and organisations since, unlike Mutual Funds, they require a sizable initial investment. AIF as a fund, is typically established or incorporated in India in the form of a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) or Company or Trust or Body Corporate.[1] Incorporated in 2012 by the Securities and Exchange board of India, the market regulator's intent was to make equity markets more sophisticated for investors with a massive volume of wealth and distinct goals from the average Indian investor. Investors are cautioned not to confuse AIFs with the following financial instruments: Mutual funds, Collective investment schemes, Employee Stock Options Trusts, Employee welfare trusts or gratuit...
Read more

A brief overview - Litigation Funding

Image
“Litigation funding allows lawsuits to be decided on their merits, and not based on which party has deeper pockets or stronger appetite for protracted litigation”   Bond and stock markets both witnessed bull runs from 1980 to 2021, resulting in higher returns for investors. These strong returns have made equity valuations at historically high levels and bond yields at historically low levels, implying that expected returns are currently lower than their historical averages. As a result, the current situation presents difficulties for conventional portfolios, such as a "balanced" 60 per cent equity/40 per cent bond portfolio.   This has caused numerous investors, both institutional and retail, to search for a variety of alternative investments , each with its own set of risks and returns. As a result, they have dramatically increased their allocations to alternative investments, which have significantly less exposure to the economic cycle risk of stocks and bonds as well a...
Read more

Assignment of NRRAs under Regulation 37A

Image
On 13 th November 2020, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (“ IBBI ”) issued the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations, 2020. One of the major purposes, for which this amendment was brought in was to ease the process of sale of liquidation assets. As we all are aware that realization  of some assets (such as continent claims, disputed receivables, disputed assets, refund from government etc.) have been an uphill task for any liquidator. Since realization  of these assets may take quite some time, they are referred in these regulations as ‘Not Readily Realizable  Asset’ or NRRA, which term has been introduced by inserting Regulation 37A. There is always a sense of urgency in a liquidation process and liquidator tries to ensure that the creditors of corporate debtors are able to realize maximum value of the assets of corporate debtor. However, these NRRAs create a sort of hurdle in this urgent process. Regul...
Read more